A morning review from Wolfe Research was unbelievable. Mostly, however, we take such reviews as people having credibility because the company for which they work does such hard work to come up with the results.
This morning, the reviewer talking about what he sees in the coming U. S. presidential election. He talked about what each one had to offer and where they were standing.
We put his comments in the trash because he talked about polling errors in Trump’s favor or polling error “in the other person’s favor.” So he started out showing his bias. Trump was named – Kamala Harris was called “the other person.” He went on to talk about what his research company thought each person had to offer. We tuned him off because his bias was clear and shared by many people on the financial channel as well as other places.
Don’t pass over such small shockingly racist and sexist comments which are so structurally in the system that we assume there is nothing to it and if you point these things out – you are just “picking” unnecessarily. This is institutional racism and how it is maintained. It gives to you the unsaid impression that “the other person” is not really on a par with the person talked about with his full name mentioned.
